![]() Direct outputs of their activities introduce indirect outcomes, bringing wider changes in culture and policy. Social entrepreneurs intentionally tackle social challenges, but their actions bring unintentional results, such as the transfer of state responsibilities onto communities. We show that the development of the contemporary significance of social entrepreneurialism lies in a combination of complex context-specific structural forces and the activities of agents who initiate, demand, and impose change. Using Giddens’s structuration theory and empirical data from a study with social enterprise stakeholders, the article explores how social entrepreneurs and the structure co-create one another. We also add to the field of experimental economics by advancing research on altruism under risk and with negative externalities. ![]() The paper makes a contribution to entrepreneurship research by qualifying the implications of talent allocation models and highlighting the importance of distinguishing between the two types This finding applies to both certain and risky payoffs with and without negative externalities. A moderator analysis reveals that less creative individuals with business talent are significantly more selfish than all others, including the creative with business talent. Generally, both the less business-talented and the more creative are more willing to forego private payoffs to avoid losses to others. We find that making a distinction between creative talent and business talent explains systematic differences in selfish behavior. ![]() This paper experimentally analyses selfish preferences of the entrepreneurially tal-Įnted. Talent allocation models assume that entrepreneurially talented people are selfish and thus allocate into unproductive or even destructive activities if these offer the highest private returns.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |